The United Nations climate talks in Bonn are facing a crisis of accessibility and inclusivity, with visa delays and shrinking civic space casting a shadow over the event. As delegates from around the world gather to discuss the future of our planet, the question of who gets a seat at the table is more pressing than ever. This issue is not just about red tape and bureaucracy; it's about the very principles of global climate governance and the future of our planet. The 64th session of the Subsidiary Bodies (SB64) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) is the first major negotiating session since COP30 in Belém, where almost 200 nations failed to produce a roadmap to phase out fossil fuels despite growing momentum. The talks, which commenced on 8 June and will finish on 18 June, arrive at a moment of growing pressure to turn political commitments into implementation pathways on adaptation, fossil fuels, food systems, land use, trade, and just transition. One of the main questions hanging over the summit will be how political initiatives can form outside of the formal UN process – following on from the success of the Santa Marta conference on fossil fuels that took place in April. However, concern is growing that these climate talks are becoming increasingly exclusive and inaccessible – particularly for those living in developing countries, who are the most affected by climate change. Climate negotiations affect billions of people around the world, but most people cannot be in the room. Civil society press briefings are one of the key ways the public gets an independent account of what is happening behind closed doors. This issue is especially important because many journalists, particularly from developing countries, are unable to attend in person due to cost, visa barriers or shrinking newsroom budgets. For the last three decades, Climate Action Network (CAN), a global network of more than 2,500 civil society organisations in over 150 countries, has held daily press briefings at UN climate talks. These briefings are the main way that those organisations can communicate what is happening inside the negotiations to journalists, observers and the wider public. However, this year at Bonn, CAN was allocated just five press conference slots for the entire conference. After a public outcry, the UN has now allocated CAN two additional press conference slots during the SB64 summit. We're deeply concerned by reports that civil society press access at SB64 has been significantly reduced, says Dr Ketakandriana "Ke" Rafitoson, Executive Director of Resource Justice Network. Civil society briefings are one of the few ways the public can understand what is happening inside highly technical negotiations. Restricting that space risks weakening accountability precisely when Parties should be rebuilding trust in multilateral climate action. When access for civil society is reduced, it is not only NGOs that lose out, warns Mohamed Adow, founder and director of climate think tank Power Shift Africa. Journalists, citizens and communities around the world lose a vital window into the negotiations. The principle at stake is whether independent civil society voices have a regular platform within the UN climate process. Many governments argue that negotiations require a controlled space in order to be effective, but Baboucarr Nyang of CAN Africa tells Euronews Earth that there is a "profound difference between a quiet room and a closed one". Negotiations can be focused and still be fair, he adds. But when it is consistently African delegates, Pacific islanders, and frontline community representatives who are denied visas, delayed at borders, or priced out by soaring hotel costs while wealthy country delegations arrive without a single barrier – that is not process management. That is exclusion wearing a bureaucratic mask. Visa barriers to climate meetings are neither new nor unique to Bonn. The German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS) has been raising concerns about exclusion of delegates from the least developed countries from UN climate negotiations in Europe due to paperwork delays as far back as 2008. Last year’s climate event in Bonn saw 223 delegates from Africa and Asia experience difficulties in getting visas in time or at all. 25 applicants were denied a visa outright, while 167 applications were left unprocessed and 37 received visa delays. Burundi, Cameroon, Egypt, Morocco, and Rwanda were all left without a single representative due to this issue, and things are only getting worse. According to the IDOS, reported cases of delegates struggling with their visa application rose to 298. Randa Khaled from the Egyptian environmental organisation Greenish is just one of the many climate activists who will likely miss the negotiations due to her visa application not being processed in time. Khaled obtained UNFCCC accreditation, applied for a visa – paying €150 – made travel preparations and submitted her visa application on time, but her participation remains uncertain. She tells Euronews Earth she’s "devastated" by the visa backlog, adding: "What makes this especially frustrating is that climate negotiations repeatedly emphasise inclusion, equity, and participation. However, when representatives from countries like Egypt are unable to physically access the spaces where decisions are being made, those principles begin to feel conditional rather than universal." The financial impact has also been "significant" for Khaled: "For many grassroots organisations and youth-led initiatives, resources are already limited. Every delayed visa, every postponed appointment, and every uncertainty carries a real financial cost that wealthier organisations from developed countries are often better positioned to absorb." Khaled argues that the ongoing issue contradicts the heart of global climate governance, demanding that mobility and access must be treated as part of climate justice itself. Euronews Earth has been told that an employee from Powershift Africa, who lives in Ghana, has had her German visa rejected. Imagine spending months preparing to represent your community at the most important climate meeting in the world only to be turned away at the embassy or not even being responded to, says Nyang. This is the reality for too many African delegates. When the people who live with floods, droughts and food insecurity every single day cannot get into the room, how can anyone call the outcomes fair? Trust is not built in polished communities. It is built when a Ugandan farmer, a Kenyan fisherwoman, or a Sahelian pastoralist can see someone who looks like them, who has walked in their shoes, sitting at that table.
